notallfeminists
notallfeminists:

whollywhovian729701:

matt-ruins-feminisms-shit:

notallfeminists:

source: Real Face of Feminism
Topless anti-catholic protester interrupts the Christmas Day service at Cologne Cathedral. [article]

More anti-christian shenanigans from feminists. Christians, Atheists, Men Gamers, …are feminists systematically trying to piss off enough groups so that eventually everyone has a reason to hate them? 

So because shes anti-christian and female that makes her a feminist? :|

Click the link that says [article]. She’s from FEMEN. 

I will say that as far as ‘protests’ go, this is pretty hysterical.

notallfeminists:

whollywhovian729701:

matt-ruins-feminisms-shit:

notallfeminists:

source: Real Face of Feminism

Topless anti-catholic protester interrupts the Christmas Day service at Cologne Cathedral. [article]

More anti-christian shenanigans from feminists. Christians, Atheists, Men Gamers, …are feminists systematically trying to piss off enough groups so that eventually everyone has a reason to hate them? 

So because shes anti-christian and female that makes her a feminist? :|

Click the link that says [article]. She’s from FEMEN. 

I will say that as far as ‘protests’ go, this is pretty hysterical.

sjwstupidity
sjwstupidity:

coronaryay:

sjwstupidity:

So I got ComiPro Manga Maker and I don’t regret a thing.
Based on my argument with coronaryay

Or: A Study in Missing the Point, by sjwstupidity

You keep saying I missed the point but I took your literal argument and put it in there and countered it directly.  If I’m still missing the point then the onus is on you now to clarify it, since as yet you’ve repeatedly failed to articulate the point you’re actually trying to make.
Either that or I didn’t actually miss your fucking point and you’re just too much of a bitch to admit that you have no decent argument against anything I’ve fucking said, so you’re going to duck and dodge and pretend the fault lies with me.  I think that’s what’s actually happening here.

The majority of modern feminism isn’t anti-misogyny, it’s anti-sex.
This argument is a good signifier of that. Women depicted in a sexual way is sexist and oppression, even if their design was created by a woman - because they’re anti-sex, not anti-sexism.
Sex is bad, lusting for people is bad, being what the public generally define as attractive of sexual is bad, therefor displaying sexuality is bad, unless you’re tailoring to my exact desires, then it’s okay and I’ll reblog a thousand gay supernatural fanfics so you can fuel my fetishization of same-sex relationships.
Facts and reality do not matter to these people, it does not matter if the vast majority of games depict violence against men because they cann’t fathom men being sexualized, but if a woman is involved, then it’s sexual. Even if there is nothing sexual about the woman depicted - because they can’t see them anything other than a sex object, because they’ve been taught that every woman is seen as a sex object. Even if the rest of society does not subscribe to that dogma.
The long and the short of it is that everything involving a woman is now a taboo subject in media, yet if you don’t involve women, it’s a taboo subject. It’s intentionally paradoxical and inevitably people will wise up and learn to ignore them.

sjwstupidity:

coronaryay:

sjwstupidity:

So I got ComiPro Manga Maker and I don’t regret a thing.

Based on my argument with coronaryay

Or: A Study in Missing the Point, by sjwstupidity

You keep saying I missed the point but I took your literal argument and put it in there and countered it directly.  If I’m still missing the point then the onus is on you now to clarify it, since as yet you’ve repeatedly failed to articulate the point you’re actually trying to make.

Either that or I didn’t actually miss your fucking point and you’re just too much of a bitch to admit that you have no decent argument against anything I’ve fucking said, so you’re going to duck and dodge and pretend the fault lies with me.  I think that’s what’s actually happening here.

The majority of modern feminism isn’t anti-misogyny, it’s anti-sex.

This argument is a good signifier of that. Women depicted in a sexual way is sexist and oppression, even if their design was created by a woman - because they’re anti-sex, not anti-sexism.

Sex is bad, lusting for people is bad, being what the public generally define as attractive of sexual is bad, therefor displaying sexuality is bad, unless you’re tailoring to my exact desires, then it’s okay and I’ll reblog a thousand gay supernatural fanfics so you can fuel my fetishization of same-sex relationships.

Facts and reality do not matter to these people, it does not matter if the vast majority of games depict violence against men because they cann’t fathom men being sexualized, but if a woman is involved, then it’s sexual. Even if there is nothing sexual about the woman depicted - because they can’t see them anything other than a sex object, because they’ve been taught that every woman is seen as a sex object. Even if the rest of society does not subscribe to that dogma.

The long and the short of it is that everything involving a woman is now a taboo subject in media, yet if you don’t involve women, it’s a taboo subject. It’s intentionally paradoxical and inevitably people will wise up and learn to ignore them.

talking-fedora
notallfeminists:

kaon4shi:

vladimirnootin:


 The legal problem for Sarkeesian is that fundraising through public deceit is against the law in America, as Mike from Danger & Play helpfully pointed out. [donotlink article]

omg

Article doesn’t explain under what “false pretenses” she raised her project funds. She asks people to back her project, and she’s doing the project. She hasn’t lied about what she’s spending donated funds on. Claiming to have received threats (I personally believe her but that’s beside the point) has nothing to do with it. If she lied, that would be manipulative but in no way illegal. 

"She asks people to back her project, and she’s doing the project." She was going to deliver 12 video’s by December 2012. It’s now September 2014, how many video’s did she make? 4? 5? 
"She hasn’t lied about what she’s spending donated funds on." She asked for 6.000 dollars for her project. She got 26 times her asking amount. That’s mm152.922 dollars, for those 12 video’s that were supposed to be done and delivered by December 2012. She hasn’t said one word on where all that money went.
"Claiming to received threats has nothing to do with it." Actually it has. If you claim to have received threats to gain attention for your video’s and to raise money (because we all know she doesn’t have enough money!), and those threats turn out to be fabricated, that’s a felony. It’s called ‘fundraising through public deceit’. That’s was that article was about.
Don’t defend someone like Anita Sarkeesian without doing research.

notallfeminists:

kaon4shi:

vladimirnootin:

 The legal problem for Sarkeesian is that fundraising through public deceit is against the law in America, as Mike from Danger & Play helpfully pointed out. [donotlink article]

omg

Article doesn’t explain under what “false pretenses” she raised her project funds. She asks people to back her project, and she’s doing the project. She hasn’t lied about what she’s spending donated funds on. Claiming to have received threats (I personally believe her but that’s beside the point) has nothing to do with it. If she lied, that would be manipulative but in no way illegal. 

"She asks people to back her project, and she’s doing the project." She was going to deliver 12 video’s by December 2012. It’s now September 2014, how many video’s did she make? 4? 5?

"She hasn’t lied about what she’s spending donated funds on." She asked for 6.000 dollars for her project. She got 26 times her asking amount. That’s mm152.922 dollars, for those 12 video’s that were supposed to be done and delivered by December 2012. She hasn’t said one word on where all that money went.

"Claiming to received threats has nothing to do with it." Actually it has. If you claim to have received threats to gain attention for your video’s and to raise money (because we all know she doesn’t have enough money!), and those threats turn out to be fabricated, that’s a felony. It’s called ‘fundraising through public deceit’. That’s was that article was about.

Don’t defend someone like Anita Sarkeesian without doing research.

sjwstupidity

poorpoorpitifulme:

talking-fedora:

exgynocraticgrrl:

Breaking The Male Code: After Steubenville, A Call To Action

 (Left to Right): Peter Buffett, Jimmie Briggs, Joe Ehrmann, Tony Porter,
 Dave Zirin and Moderator Eve Ensler.

"Women are not raping ourselves, it turns out."

Except, not only is this victim-erasure, but she wrote a fucking rape and called it a “good rape” because it was woman-on-woman. Like. Does she not understand that?

“Women are not raping ourselves”?! Did she forget that lesbian and bisexual women exist, or is she just so stupid and ideologically blind that she thinks all women are magical beautiful creatures who would never do anything wrong? Either way, you’d be hard pressed to find many more obnoxious examples of misogyny and victim erasure perpetuated by anyone not ascribing to feminist ideology…

This is the number one question anyone in the games scene should be asking themselves in regards to feminism and gaming.

Where is the evidence that video games have a ‘profound’ impact on the treatment of women?

Even if you completely buy into Sarkeesian’s videos, you should be asking this. It is the fundamental driving force of her entire career and there has not been a single shred of evidence to support her claims - and she hasn’t even tried to provide any.

Don’t you find this troubling? Don’t you think she should have something to back up what she says? I just don’t understand.

draikou

draikou:

hautepockets:

draikou:

hautepockets:

a man telling a women that she is not oppressed is like a white person telling a black person that he or she is not oppressed

Then in that case, a woman can’t tell men that they’re not oppressed, just as a black person can’t tell a white person they’re not oppressed.

Regardless, Women in Western Society are NOT oppressed.

correction: draikou telling a women she is not oppressed is like draikou
telling a black person that he or she is not oppressed

image

It’s a lot more like a woman saying that woman are not oppressed in western society.

Because that’s literally what was just said.